Started By
Message

re: Could Oklahoma screw the BIG XII?

Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:18 am to
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22282 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:18 am to
So let's say that SECN subscribers increase by 5 million subscribers after OU is added to the conference. The SECN does not profit from this at all? I am legitimately asking because I am not familiar with the contract.
Posted by Bubbles Up
Member since Jul 2011
2910 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:32 am to
Absolutely we profit, but only if it drives subscribers. The per subscriber payout, both in and outside the footprint, is divided up equally among the membership. The per subscriber payout in the footprint is substantially higher than that outside the footprint. Because cable and satellight subscribership would probably remain flat in Oklahoma if we added them, our only increase in revenue would be those folks paying "in the footprint rates" versus what they are paying now. There simply isn't enough population to incrementally increase revenue enough to offset an additional payout.

This is why expansion has to drive additional in footprint subscribers, not viewers.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter