Started By
Message

re: (takes off SEC goggles for two seconds) Satellite Camps, what's the big deal???

Posted on 4/9/16 at 9:41 am to
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
5693 posts
Posted on 4/9/16 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Why can't you see the positive side of this? An earlier signing period and potentially earlier official visits (and more of them) for prospects.



The positives are obvious, esp for us SEC boys, and really this argument is more me playing devil's advocate than anything else. Although I understand my tone can be misleading.

My whole point is this rule is arbitrary and really doesn't make much sense in the big picture, especially if you're trying to be consistent with everything else that's going on and fair to everyone.

It is a positive (for us) but its indefensible from the standpoint of a governing body.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72343 posts
Posted on 4/9/16 at 10:14 am to
What's done is done. I am glad the overzealous Michigan fans were shut down. But this ruling does hurt schools that had been conducting less public camps for years.

But I want to point out once again that this can help with the move pass an earlier signing period and more official visits. That can help potential prospects as much, or more, than any of these camps would have.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter