Started By
Message

re: Guice or Sony?

Posted on 3/11/16 at 2:40 pm to
Posted by SICEMDAWGS11
Marietta, GA
Member since Jan 2015
922 posts
Posted on 3/11/16 at 2:40 pm to
Posted by PurpleandGeauld
Florence, TX
Member since Oct 2013
5193 posts
Posted on 3/11/16 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

You can't do that. It just never works out that way. As good as Guice will be, he will not get 2500 yards rushing.


/agree It is much different when you become the feature back and people begin keying on you. That was a response to a comment about his being a "serviceable backup." His performance in limited action has been better than "serviceable."
Posted by Blanky6715
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2014
4377 posts
Posted on 3/11/16 at 3:56 pm to
Sony is very nice, honestly the way both backs run (after watching the highlights) is extremely similar. Aside from the couple plays against Alabama and the ridiculous one he had against Tennessee (which looks like one of the like 4 or 5 guice runs I've seen) nothing from that tells me he is better than guice other than he has more experience. The first like 2 and a half minutes of highlights were a lot of plays against the lower half of D1. Schools like ULM and southern. Some nice South Carolina highlights but if you watch what Guice did to South Carolina then lol.

To the arguement that Fournette wears them down first. This is not always the case as Guice gets a lot of playing time throughout all the quarters and he even started one game this year.

As I see it I give a slight edge to Sony solely based on experience.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter