Started By
Message

re: Guice or Sony?

Posted on 3/11/16 at 1:21 pm to
Posted by PurpleandGeauld
Florence, TX
Member since Oct 2013
5193 posts
Posted on 3/11/16 at 1:21 pm to
I never said Guice was the better back. Also, most of the posters on here have some idea of what both of these guys are capable of. It's not like 2 guys out of high school who haven't played a snap are being discussed.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
59008 posts
Posted on 3/11/16 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

I never said Guice was the better back.


Good. because I never said you did!

quote:

Also, most of the posters on here have some idea of what both of these guys are capable of.


Not really. I saw very few LSU games this past season. What i saw of Guice....I was very impressed. He will definitely be a great one.

quote:

It's not like 2 guys out of high school who haven't played a snap are being discussed.


While true, there is very little to base anything on with Guice. Anybody that takes 50 carries and extrapolates that out to 300+ carries is fooling themselves, though. You can't do that. It just never works out that way. As good as Guice will be, he will not get 2500 yards rushing.

Don't get me wrong...I think Guice is really, really good and will rush for 1500-1700 yards when he takes over for Fournette. Might even contend for the heisman. LSU is very fortunate to have had two backs like them back to back, just like we were with Gurley and Chubb. But, I don't think Sony is nearly as good as Gurley or Chubb. Totally different runners.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter