Started By
Message
re: USCe losing to the Citadel cost them Tom Herman
Posted on 2/16/16 at 10:00 am to cardboardboxer
Posted on 2/16/16 at 10:00 am to cardboardboxer
Boxer I think you and rooster are arguing two different points but are both right. you are saying that AT THE BEGINNING of the search would we have had Muschamp at the top of the board. At the beginning of the search there wasn't really anyone else looking all that hard for a head coach so yes you were right about that.
However, in the post that you quoted from rooster, he said "considering the circumstances and who we were competing against..." again at the beginning of the search there was no competition, you being right, at the end there definitely was, rooster having some valid points.
As far as the Odom hire at Mizzou, can't really comment here, didn't follow his career at all.
However, in the post that you quoted from rooster, he said "considering the circumstances and who we were competing against..." again at the beginning of the search there was no competition, you being right, at the end there definitely was, rooster having some valid points.
As far as the Odom hire at Mizzou, can't really comment here, didn't follow his career at all.
1
Posted on 2/16/16 at 10:18 am to GameCocky88
quote:
At the beginning of the search there wasn't really anyone else looking all that hard for a head coach so yes you were right about that.
bullshite to you too good sir. From the start USC fans here speculated who the new coach should be:
LINK
Muschamp wasn't mentioned EXCEPT to comment what a joke that choice would be:
quote:
This will probably draw laughs (as it probably should after some message board poster "confirmed" Muschamp to USC with similar info)
That is a night and day difference than Mizzou fan expectations.
quote:
However, in the post that you quoted from rooster, he said "considering the circumstances and who we were competing against..." again at the beginning of the search there was no competition, you being right, at the end there definitely was, rooster having some valid points.
My only beef with that perspective is that USC was the first Power 5 job to open and the last to be filled. We now know for a fact that Muschamp was a least a second choice, and he was probably even further down the list. Honestly I think your current AD is over his head (and he maybe lucked out) but that is another conversation.
Does any of that matter right now today? No. Do old fan expectations determine how good of a job Muschamp will do? No.
But lets be honest about this guys- none of yall wanted Muschamp. Any positivity yall have about the hire today was manufactured since the hire was made. Nothing wrong with that, but be honest about it. Some Mizzou fans wanted Odom from day one.
This post was edited on 2/16/16 at 10:20 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News