I wouldn't say upset, but it shouldn't even be a contest. 24/7 and every site negatively rank recruits that verbally commit well in advance or create little to no drama in their recruitment. They get more clicks, subscribers, ect from the influx of drama caused by many national recruits. You see time and again recruits that excell at events and camps get dropped for one that would lead to "a more exciting NSD."

Call it what you want, but I'll call it BS. LSU should have at least 4 or 5 5 stars ATM with a chance to add a sixth. Either way though, their star ranking won't effect their on field play.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by DawgsLife

Member since Jun 2013

59021 posts

Posted on 1/29/16 at 2:02 pm to memphisplaya

quote:
I wouldn't say upset, but it shouldn't even be a contest. 24/7 and every site negatively rank recruits that verbally commit well in advance or create little to no drama in their recruitment. They get more clicks, subscribers, ect from the influx of drama caused by many national recruits. You see time and again recruits that excell at events and camps get dropped for one that would lead to "a more exciting NSD."

Call it what you want, but I'll call it BS. LSU should have at least 4 or 5 5 stars ATM with a chance to add a sixth. Either way though, their star ranking won't effect their on field play.

Just so I understand correctly....

We should not pay any attention to the recruiting services that rank players for a living....but we should listen to your rankings?

I am just here for the entertainment. I could care less, but we have two schools claiming they are going to finish MUCH higher than Kyle said they would and BOTH partially based it off getting Fulton.