Started By
Message
5 of the top 10 top recruiting Classes are from the SEC
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:27 am
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:27 am
247sports
1) LSU
5) Florida
6) Ole Miss
7) Alabama
8) Georgia
I mean damn.
Toughest Conference
1) LSU
5) Florida
6) Ole Miss
7) Alabama
8) Georgia
I mean damn.
Toughest Conference This post was edited on 1/25/16 at 8:44 am
16
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:28 am to circlerebel17
tNetwork Baw
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:32 am to circlerebel17
We will be joining you all shortly
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:35 am to AA7
Sure you will.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:36 am to circlerebel17
quote:
5 of the top 10 recruiting Classes are from the SEC
Water is wet
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:37 am to circlerebel17
Ole Miss has come quite a ways.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:38 am to cyogi
I am starting to think that Ole Miss might be cheating.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:38 am to circlerebel17
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:38 am to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
I am starting to think that Ole Miss might be cheating.
Hookers and blow, my friend.
Hookers and blow.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:39 am to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
I am starting to think that Ole Miss might be cheating.
Might be?
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:39 am to Gradual_Stroke
They're about to get the hammer
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:39 am to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
I am starting to think that Ole Miss might be cheating.
Along with 12 other SEC teams.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:39 am to cyogi
Les certainly has rebounded nicely from Allevas drama
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:40 am to skrayper
quote:
Hookers and spice, my friend.
Hookers and spice.
FIFY
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:41 am to circlerebel17
Since this list was posted by an Ole Miss fan and it has LSU first (as of now) I feel I can ask this without being branded 'jealous' or other niceties.
Since there are umpteen thousand boys playing HS football, is there really THAT big of a difference in a class ranked #1 vs one that's ranked #10? Who knows if the #1 WR in Florida is better than the #1 WR in California for instance?
Since there are umpteen thousand boys playing HS football, is there really THAT big of a difference in a class ranked #1 vs one that's ranked #10? Who knows if the #1 WR in Florida is better than the #1 WR in California for instance?
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:48 am to circlerebel17
Also Mizzou better watch out... Vandy's nipping at their heels
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:50 am to I-59 Tiger
Recruiting rankings are for entertainment. They are a decent gage of how well a team has recruited, but it is impossible to properly evaluate thousands of high school kids.
Hell NFL scouts struggle to evaluate the 250 to 300 NFL prospects every year.
Hell NFL scouts struggle to evaluate the 250 to 300 NFL prospects every year.
This post was edited on 1/25/16 at 8:53 am
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:50 am to circlerebel17
Are you surprised by this?
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:52 am to BhamDore
quote:
Recruiting rankings are for entertainment. They are a decent gage of how well a team has recruited, but it is impossible to property evaluate thousands of high school kids.
There's a decent correlation between pre- and post-college rating, though. I.e., higher stars are more likely to be drafted higher.
Its not perfect, obviously. Some kids are diamonds in the rough. Others bloom early and never pan out at the next level. But on average the system is pretty good.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 8:53 am to I-59 Tiger
Bama has won 4 of the last 7 NC and has had like 4 or 5 consecutive #1 recruiting "championships". Suggest, recruiting at a level that high produces success.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News