re: OT: Watching 'Making a Murderer'

I dont' care how much evidence MAM didn't show, the point is that what WAS shown is plenty enough to not convict.

For some reason people seem to lose sight of the BIGGEST, #1, OVERALL POINT of the whole system here...the guy is innocent until proven guilty BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. Period, the end. He very well may have killed theresa. I don't know. He could be a very awful and evil person getting what he deserves. But there is asbolutely no way, no how that any intelligent person with zero bias whatsoever would vote to convict based on the case laid out by the defense. I'm nto saying SA is innocent, but as a juror you don't have to prove he's innocent. All you have to do is decide whether there is a reasonable DOUBT of his guilt. And it's simply impossible for a sane, rational being to say that he is beyond a shadow of a doubt guilty.