Started By
Message
re: The greatest dynasty in college football history, not close
Posted on 1/12/16 at 4:49 pm to IAmReality
Posted on 1/12/16 at 4:49 pm to IAmReality
I was sitting at home last night, drunk, thinking about the comparison and contrasts of the Saban Dynasty and the Miami Dynasty. Miami's is impressive because they won 4 titles with 3 different coaches from 83-91. They continued to remain relevant after that and won another title with a 4th coach in 2001. Saban won 4 out of the last 7 and is full steam ahead. He also built an LSU program that won a title shortly after he left and has been able to stay relevant and in contention for national titles yearly. Which one is better?
Posted on 1/12/16 at 4:52 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
I was sitting at home last night, drunk, thinking about the comparison and contrasts of the Saban Dynasty and the Miami Dynasty. Miami's is impressive because they won 4 titles with 3 different coaches from 83-91. They continued to remain relevant after that and won another title with a 4th coach in 2001. Saban won 4 out of the last 7 and is full steam ahead. He also built an LSU program that won a title shortly after he left and has been able to stay relevant and in contention for national titles yearly. Which one is better?
Miami. They were NOTHING before the 80s. That is an amazing leap.
Bama was a top 5 program in the sport before Nick ever showed up.
Posted on 1/12/16 at 4:55 pm to MontyFranklyn
Miami's teams were also as dirty as they get. There's no way around that. IMO, the only people who seriously believe Saban runs a dirty program are people who would never accept any other conclusion. So I prefer comparing Bowden to Saban. Free Shoes wasn't clean, of course, but it wasn't anywhere close to Miami's level of corruption.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)