Started By
Message
re: LSU About To Pay 3rd and Chavis Again
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:24 am to FishFearMe
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:24 am to FishFearMe
Looks like Chavis knew of the changes at the time they were made. Not sure if it makes a difference in the case at all.
2
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:28 am to OLDBEACHCOMBER
quote:
Looks like Chavis knew of the changes at the time they were made. Not sure if it makes a difference in the case at all.
Because lawyers love to hear themselves talk, the correct answer here is maybe.
But in reality, it's not going to make a huge difference either way, the physical language was altered, but the deal itself stayed the same and was actually clarified. Even if the judge relies on the original wording nothing is going to change.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:29 am to OLDBEACHCOMBER
quote:
Looks like Chavis knew of the changes at the time they were made. Not sure if it makes a difference in the case at all.
The actual changes:
John Lombardi's name was removed when he was fired and Mark Ewing added William Jenkins' name, who replaced Lombardi on an interim basis.
Ewing changed the language regarding the buyout dates from “between 24 months to 36 months” to “between the first day of the 36th month remaining to the last day of the 24th month remaining.”
He also changed language in the buyout dates from “between 11 months and 23 months” to “between the first day of the 23rd month remaining to the last day of the 12th month.”
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News