Started By
Message
re: Has the "Big Six" jumped the shark?
Posted on 10/1/15 at 4:47 pm to TheDude321
Posted on 10/1/15 at 4:47 pm to TheDude321
I like the system as a whole, but I think divisional titles should not count.
The other problem is that division titles only exist from 1992-present, so there is too much of an emphasis on the more recent seasons.
For instance, if Team A wins the SEC Title this year, they will get 3 points (1 for winning the division and 2 for winning the SEC). But if Team B won the SEC Title in 1991, they only get 2 points because there were no divisions.
So you are essentially saying that SEC Titles won from 1992 to present are worth 33% more value than SEC Titles won prior to 1992.
It throws off the entire system.
The other problem is that division titles only exist from 1992-present, so there is too much of an emphasis on the more recent seasons.
For instance, if Team A wins the SEC Title this year, they will get 3 points (1 for winning the division and 2 for winning the SEC). But if Team B won the SEC Title in 1991, they only get 2 points because there were no divisions.
So you are essentially saying that SEC Titles won from 1992 to present are worth 33% more value than SEC Titles won prior to 1992.
It throws off the entire system.
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News