Started By
Message

re: If you were Mauk would you transfer?

Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:09 pm to
Posted by Mizzoufan26
Vacaville CA
Member since Sep 2012
17277 posts
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:09 pm to
Is it possible that Mauk has so much going on that the suspension was actually the coaching staffs way of letting him off without much damage to him.

If he gets replaced that's disparaging, no one likes that.
If he takes a leave of absence he gets ridiculed for not toughing it out
Posted by Jagd Tiger
The Kinder, Gentler Jagd
Member since Mar 2014
18139 posts
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:32 pm to

it's possible, just like it's possible it was all "timed" to help get Pinkel off the "there's no controversy here" hook he put himself on..

as pointed out here, in this thread, the timing really is a blessing for Pinkel.

so in these "grassy knoll" theories did Malik Cueler also "take one for the team"?

conspiracy abounds..
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67508 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

Is it possible that Mauk has so much going on that the suspension was actually the coaching staffs way of letting him off without much damage to him.

No because it doesn't explain Cuellar's suspension. I don't buy the drug rumor; just doesn't make sense to me. Since both MM & MC (who are roomies BTW) got suspended at the same time I'm betting on them getting blasted and then they missed or were very late to a team meeting/practice and when called on the carpet, they or at least 1 of them (MM) blew a gasket.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter