Started By
Message
re: If you were Mauk would you transfer?
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:09 pm to jafo
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:09 pm to jafo
Is it possible that Mauk has so much going on that the suspension was actually the coaching staffs way of letting him off without much damage to him.
If he gets replaced that's disparaging, no one likes that.
If he takes a leave of absence he gets ridiculed for not toughing it out
If he gets replaced that's disparaging, no one likes that.
If he takes a leave of absence he gets ridiculed for not toughing it out
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:32 pm to Mizzoufan26
it's possible, just like it's possible it was all "timed" to help get Pinkel off the "there's no controversy here" hook he put himself on..
as pointed out here, in this thread, the timing really is a blessing for Pinkel.
so in these "grassy knoll" theories did Malik Cueler also "take one for the team"?
conspiracy abounds..
Posted on 10/1/15 at 12:57 pm to Mizzoufan26
quote:
Is it possible that Mauk has so much going on that the suspension was actually the coaching staffs way of letting him off without much damage to him.
No because it doesn't explain Cuellar's suspension. I don't buy the drug rumor; just doesn't make sense to me. Since both MM & MC (who are roomies BTW) got suspended at the same time I'm betting on them getting blasted and then they missed or were very late to a team meeting/practice and when called on the carpet, they or at least 1 of them (MM) blew a gasket.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News