Started By
Message
re: Gumps... Why is history decades old more important than history a year old?
Posted on 9/16/15 at 3:26 pm to Whereisomaha
Posted on 9/16/15 at 3:26 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
If you want to talk about the past, why not discuss the past that is the most relevant, like a team made up of similar players with the same coaching staff?
Ok. Saban and part of the coaching staff have been been at Bama since 07. Same caliber players year in and year out. 7-1 against OM.
So what would you like to discuss?
1
Posted on 9/16/15 at 3:31 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
Ok. Saban and part of the coaching staff have been been at Bama since 07. Same caliber players year in and year out. 7-1 against OM.
So what would you like to discuss?
What does pre Freeze have to do with this? Is Bama the same program now as it was under Shula? The only history that is relevant is the past three years because thats when the coaching staffs are the same. Over that three year span, our talent has increased, while Bama's has stayed the same. We beat you with Freeze's most talented team last year. This year's is now his most talented. Unless you are saying this is Saban's most talented team then the history argument is moot.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News