Started By
Message
re: So are turnovers gifts now?
Posted on 9/4/15 at 12:28 pm to CNB
Posted on 9/4/15 at 12:28 pm to CNB
Doesn't matter. It's still a turnover.
Bottom line: our defense made plays and got pressure that we couldn't do for the most part last season. We're beginning to look like that fast angry defense that SC was once known for..
Bottom line: our defense made plays and got pressure that we couldn't do for the most part last season. We're beginning to look like that fast angry defense that SC was once known for..
3
Posted on 9/4/15 at 12:30 pm to DorchesterGamecock
quote:
Bottom line: our defense made plays and got pressure that we couldn't do for the most part last season. We're beginning to look like that fast angry defense that SC was once known for..
This is what I'd take away from the game. Your defensive line practically lived in UNC's backfield on passing plays.
Posted on 9/4/15 at 12:50 pm to DorchesterGamecock
quote:
Bottom line: our defense made plays and got pressure that we couldn't do for the most part last season. We're beginning to look like that fast angry defense that SC was once known for..
Don't insult the awesome defenses yal used to have by comparing them to the shitsuckers who played last night. Yal's defenses used to be nasty. The back seven on that defense last night could be timed with a sundial. Deep in's, wheels and posts were open all day, Williams just sucks. Yal used to smother rushing attacks not let Hood go in dry on yal every time Fedora grew a brain and gave him the ball.
The DL looks a little better (couldn't look worse), but not really sure if it's a result of Williams' terrible pocket presence or actual pass rush. Yal will be ~.500 again this year.
Posted on 9/4/15 at 4:59 pm to DorchesterGamecock
quote:
Bottom line: our defense made plays and got pressure that we couldn't do for the most part last season. We're beginning to look like that fast angry defense that SC was once known for..
Maybe, but you still gave up 440 yards. Above your average from last year. I want to give SC credit for the turnovers, but I just can't give them full credit 3. That's on the QB. 2 of them were no where close and in the redzone. At times UNC receivers were wide open a la A&M last year.
I'd be cautiously optimistic.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News