Started By
Message
re: 2 SEC Schools Rank in Forbes' 2015 Top 25 Best Public Colleges
Posted on 7/31/15 at 4:15 pm to Jamie Lannister
Posted on 7/31/15 at 4:15 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:
you haven't explained why was unethical about what Clemson and other schools did.
You don't think it's unethical to limit class sizes, not because you think it's the right thing to do and because you think it will help students, but so you can aid a ratio so help your rankings? You think limiting course access for Clemson students that worked their butt off to get into school for a ranking is ethical?
Or deliberately ranking peers with a poor grade? Trying to boost Clemson's reputation by trying to tarnish others? That's ethical to you?
1
Posted on 7/31/15 at 4:18 pm to theGarnetWay
isn't limiting class sizes supposed to be a good thing? So what if the only reason they did it was because of the US News criteria? Any college could have done this.
I have no problem with ranking schools lower, because unc and others are so overhyped by people. Few people think for themselves on these college reputations.
only reason you are obsessed with this, from like 7 years ago, is it is Clemson.
I have no problem with ranking schools lower, because unc and others are so overhyped by people. Few people think for themselves on these college reputations.
only reason you are obsessed with this, from like 7 years ago, is it is Clemson.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News