Started By
Message
re: Dispelling the myth of "3rd and Chavis"
Posted on 7/29/15 at 6:00 pm to Mirthomatic
Posted on 7/29/15 at 6:00 pm to Mirthomatic
What claim did I make other than to point out the statistical evidence to refute "exhausted Chavis defense" comments?
Your participation was to distract from a reasoned debate between two people because you didn't understand the conversation. So you posted a response to what you thought the conversation was about.
Your participation was to distract from a reasoned debate between two people because you didn't understand the conversation. So you posted a response to what you thought the conversation was about.
Posted on 7/29/15 at 6:05 pm to Guava Jelly
I didn't distract from anything. You made a claim, presumably relevant to your argument. The claim was wrong; and I pointed that out. If the erroneous claim was irrelevant to your argument, then no skin off your nose. If, however, it WAS relevant, then discovering your error might prompt a re-evaluation.
I have not weighed in on either side of the rest of your issue.
I have not weighed in on either side of the rest of your issue.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News