Started By
Message

re: A&M player says no thanks to going back to the Big12

Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:58 pm to
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

The difference between a non-Texas Big 12 team and a SEC team on revenue is almost $10 million a year.


Are you talking about television revenue?

Why are you comparing Tier 1-3 TV payouts for SEC teams with Tier 1-2 (and excluding Tier 3) for Big 12 teams?

Answer: Because you know that would invalidate your statement.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34353 posts
Posted on 7/24/15 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Are you talking about television revenue?



Of course. What would I be talking about, Playoff Revenue?

quote:

Why are you comparing Tier 1-3 TV payouts for SEC teams with Tier 1-2 (and excluding Tier 3) for Big 12 teams?



Because only two Big 12 teams get anything worth a damn just from Tier 3. The rest have to package their Tier 4 with their Tier 3 and pray to God someone will throw a couple million at them for it.

I mean, that is the whole point. The Big 12 doesn't have a conference network so the only program GUARANTEED to make SEC money is Texas, and only if the LHN continues to exist. The LHN existing keeps a Big 12 Network from existing, so at most that $10 million dollar mark gets cut down by a million or two for A&M.

It is hard to even guess that though, when program like WVU have to bundle all this other crap with their Tier 3 (crap we get paid for outside of the conference in the SEC too) to get it sold. At the end of the day a WVU might be making the whole 10 million more in the SEC, because they could sell things like radio rights separately from the Tier 3 PPV level games.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter