Started By
Message
re: Best Plan Ever to Maximize SEC $$ in the Future (Realignment/Expansion)
Posted on 7/10/15 at 10:04 am to cardboardboxer
Posted on 7/10/15 at 10:04 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
Why not? Pods make the most sense in a 16 team configuration.
gawd dammit.....
Posted on 7/10/15 at 6:37 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
cardboardboxer
Best Plan Ever to Maximize SEC $$ in the Future (Realignment/Expansion)
quote:
Don't you bring that shite into this thread!
Why not? Pods make the most sense in a 16 team configuration.
By having pods you ensure that all teams plays each other, and that future unbalance in conference power can be partially balanced through creative scheduling. Pods also allow for a playoff system within the conference that can increase the prestige of the SEC winner in regards to the greater college football playoffs.
Obviously the SEC at 14 teams is kinda unwieldy. With pods the schools would play every other school in their pod and then face two other schools from the other pods (with those two teams from the other pod rotating every two years, so there would be home and away games) to form a 9-game conference schedule. Obviously nine games is another hurdle.....
I will just stop there. I hate pod talk too. But I swear to God if you ever triple bump this shitty thread again I will write a multi-post essay on pods so mind numbingly boring that it will make your children will be born with narcolepsy. I know you think you trolled the shite out of us or something when in reality all you did is piss off the cardboardboxer by posting the most inane realignment thread ever on this board.
Just let it die.
(S)He is just upset because, as you pointed out, if you do 2-8 team divisions he thinks the schedule would be better! As if people aren't b'ing enough about 2-7 team divisions.
& I still think the SEC WOULD keep cross-division games through the end of time.
Posted on 7/10/15 at 6:40 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
CockInYourEar
Best Plan Ever to Maximize SEC $$ in the Future (Realignment/Expansion)
quote:
I believe that @ 16 teams, there will NOT be an East/West Division, but more of 4X4 pods.
'
Don't you bring that shite into this thread!
Then YOU explain how to schedule a 16 team conference WITH DIVISIONS AND CROSS-DIV GAMES that will be better than the 14 team setup we have now!
Posted on 7/10/15 at 6:42 pm to CockInYourEar
ALSO, per YOUR "brilliance", explain how you're going to get UGA on board with a 9 game SEC, Aub., GT, + ____ schedule each year!
Posted on 7/11/15 at 10:07 am to southernboisb
quote:
Then YOU explain how to schedule a 16 team conference WITH DIVISIONS AND CROSS-DIV GAMES that will be better than the 14 team setup we have now!
9 SEC game schedules...done.
Posted on 7/11/15 at 10:09 am to Old Sarge
quote:
The whole thread says Clemson is the flagship school of SC and vastly superior school in every aspect.
Why haven't you changed the OP?
#1 in MS is Ole Miss
#1 in SC is USC
#1 in TX is UT
https://www.businessinsider.com/best-college-sports-program-by-state-2015-7?op=1
quote:
TEXAS — The University of Texas at Austin
TEXAS — The University of Texas at Austin
Getty Images
2014 athletic department revenue: $161.0 million
Average Home Football Attendance: 98,976
Average Home Men's Basketball Attendance: 10,945
NCAA Championship Score: 21
Student Surveys on Athletics: 4.1 out of 5
Overall Rank among Schools on this list: 2
quote:
SOUTH CAROLINA — University of South Carolina
SOUTH CAROLINA — University of South Carolina
Richard Shiro/AP
2014 athletic department revenue: $98.4 million
Average Home Football Attendance: 82,401
Average Home Men's Basketball Attendance: 8,603
NCAA Championship Score: 12
Student Surveys on Athletics: 4.1 out of 5
Overall Rank among Schools on this list: 10
quote:
MISSISSIPPI — University of Mississippi
MISSISSIPPI — University of Mississippi
AP
2014 athletic department revenue: $68.9 million
Average Home Football Attendance: 59,393
Average Home Men's Basketball Attendance: 6,067
NCAA Championship Score: 0
Student Surveys on Athletics: 3.9 out of 5
Overall Rank among Schools on this list: 32
This post was edited on 7/11/15 at 10:20 am
Posted on 7/11/15 at 10:18 am to CockInYourEar
Jesus you got reverse trolled in a legendary fashion in this thread.
I am almost impressed.
I am almost impressed.
Posted on 7/11/15 at 10:21 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
Jesus you got reverse trolled in a legendary fashion in this thread.
?? Wow, your legends are pathetic. I once stepped in gum, grab a pen, I'll tell you about it.
This post was edited on 7/11/15 at 10:23 am
Posted on 7/11/15 at 10:21 am to CockInYourEar
quote:
- Goodbye: Auburn, Miss St, Vanderbilt and aTm.
I really hate to tell you this, but you would be cut before any of those schools.
Posted on 7/11/15 at 10:23 am to SavageOrangeJug
quote:
but you would be cut before any of those schools.
no, not even a chance....
Posted on 7/11/15 at 10:33 am to CockInYourEar
quote:
Wow, your legends are pathetic
I have never seen someone get so offended by the contents of their own thread. That Clemson guy is giving you a run for the money though. History will prove you to be a legend or not.
Posted on 7/11/15 at 10:40 am to CockInYourEar
quote:
no, not even a chance....
The original members would NOT be cut in favor of USC Lite.
A&M brings a lot more $$$$ to the table than your school.
You have vastly over-estimated your worth to the conference.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 5:11 pm to CockInYourEar
I agree we should have gone to 9 games when we added TA&M & Mizz..
Okay, let's take a look @ your proposed plan:
7 Div. Games
1 Annual Cross-Division Game
1 Rotating Cross-Divison Game
==================================
14 YEARS to rotate through the other division.
4X4 pods = 6 YEARS to play everybody home/away
*Also has the option to play everybody in 3 year increments or H/A in back-to-back years.
Although, I'm still waiting to hear your response on this.
"
Georgia Fan
Member since Dec 2012
443 posts
Online
re: Best Plan Ever to Maximize SEC $$ in the Future (Realignment/Expansion)(Posted on 7/10/15 at 6:42 pm to CockInYourEar)
ALSO, per YOUR "brilliance", explain how you're going to get UGA on board with a 9 game SEC, Aub., GT, + ____ schedule each year!"
Okay, let's take a look @ your proposed plan:
7 Div. Games
1 Annual Cross-Division Game
1 Rotating Cross-Divison Game
==================================
14 YEARS to rotate through the other division.
4X4 pods = 6 YEARS to play everybody home/away
*Also has the option to play everybody in 3 year increments or H/A in back-to-back years.
Although, I'm still waiting to hear your response on this.
"
Georgia Fan
Member since Dec 2012
443 posts
Online
re: Best Plan Ever to Maximize SEC $$ in the Future (Realignment/Expansion)(Posted on 7/10/15 at 6:42 pm to CockInYourEar)
ALSO, per YOUR "brilliance", explain how you're going to get UGA on board with a 9 game SEC, Aub., GT, + ____ schedule each year!"
This post was edited on 7/13/15 at 5:22 pm
Posted on 7/13/15 at 5:37 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
B/c nothing that you are saying is true and you can't back it up with facts or figures. You're just basing that off a bunch of hurt feelings.
LINK
Conference Championships:
Clemson - 20
USCe - 1
....in its entire history. Uno.
Recognized National Championships:
Clemson - 1
SC -0
Bowl History:
Clemson - 19 - 18 -0
SC - 8 - 12 - 0
Final poll appearances:
Clemson - 29
SC - 9
Academics:
LINK
Clemson - 62
SC - 113
I can keep going. Clemson is the only change you need to make to your lists. We all agree with you, EXEPT kick SC out and Clemson in.
You thought it out pretty well but couldn't get your cock-colored glasses off to see the truth.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 6:46 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
we are the named school for the state
You really think this means something don't you.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 6:58 pm to KaiserSoze99
you and the auburn guy are so 'lil bro.' Shocking that you bumped this thread days later.
...but I guess it makes sense for an aggie to bet this butthurt....butthurt is kinda y'all's thing.
...but I guess it makes sense for an aggie to bet this butthurt....butthurt is kinda y'all's thing.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:59 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
We offer more degrees and academic programs. To summarize, this past year we offered 93 bachelor degree programs and y'all offered 68.
Can you name some of the ones that SC offers but Clemson doesn't? I think 68 majors should about cover any field that you can get a job in though.
I would think the additional ones that SC offers are more liberal arts in nature, or a real niche field. I think I saw one called Museum Management. I dont' think it is a good idea to have a degree that specific. The others are probably journalism or business school related.
Clemson has an agricultural school and SC does not, and that includes things like food science, horticulture and turf grass and more life science / biology related majors in general
Other majors Clemson that SC does not are Genetics, Packaging Science, Architecture, Industrial Engineer
This post was edited on 7/13/15 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 7/13/15 at 8:07 pm to CockInYourEar
The East is a joke compared to the West - that alignment is way too unbalanced in terms of team strength.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 8:23 pm to CockInYourEar
What are you talking about?
We are agreeing with you. Who is butthurt?
We are agreeing with you. Who is butthurt?
Posted on 7/13/15 at 8:28 pm to CockInYourEar
Is there ANYONE that hasn't put it in your butt in this thread yet
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News