Started By
Message
re: Spinoff realignment thread : poaching the ACC is not the option
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:13 am to Cheese Grits
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:13 am to Cheese Grits
Am I the only one that still gets confused between the big 10ish and the big 12ish?
I mean it wasn't that big a deal when the big 10ish had 11 and the big 12 actually had 12. Now its just silly that they don't change their names that the big 10ish has 14 and the big 12ish has 10
I mean it wasn't that big a deal when the big 10ish had 11 and the big 12 actually had 12. Now its just silly that they don't change their names that the big 10ish has 14 and the big 12ish has 10
This post was edited on 7/2/15 at 3:14 am
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:02 am to Cockopotamus
quote:
Now its just silly that they don't change their names that the big 10ish has 14 and the big 12ish has 10
The Big 12 actually tried to change names with the Big 10 when they were twelve and the Big 10 was like
![](https://33.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lmy0chgeNn1qasthro1_400.gif)
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:20 am to Cockopotamus
quote:
Am I the only one that still gets confused between the big 10ish and the big 12ish?
I mean it wasn't that big a deal when the big 10ish had 11 and the big 12 actually had 12. Now its just silly that they don't change their names that the big 10ish has 14 and the big 12ish has 10
Agree 100%. Fwiw, I refer to the B1G as the Big 14, and the Big 12 as the Big 12 just to avoid the confusion, even though they should be the Medium 10, of you ask me.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)