Started By
Message

re: Spinoff realignment thread : poaching the ACC is not the option

Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:13 am to
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15745 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:13 am to
Am I the only one that still gets confused between the big 10ish and the big 12ish?

I mean it wasn't that big a deal when the big 10ish had 11 and the big 12 actually had 12. Now its just silly that they don't change their names that the big 10ish has 14 and the big 12ish has 10
This post was edited on 7/2/15 at 3:14 am
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34358 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:02 am to
quote:

Now its just silly that they don't change their names that the big 10ish has 14 and the big 12ish has 10


The Big 12 actually tried to change names with the Big 10 when they were twelve and the Big 10 was like

Posted by GeauxToBed
Covington, LA
Member since Mar 2015
6113 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Am I the only one that still gets confused between the big 10ish and the big 12ish? 

I mean it wasn't that big a deal when the big 10ish had 11 and the big 12 actually had 12. Now its just silly that they don't change their names that the big 10ish has 14 and the big 12ish has 10

Agree 100%. Fwiw, I refer to the B1G as the Big 14, and the Big 12 as the Big 12 just to avoid the confusion, even though they should be the Medium 10, of you ask me.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter