Started By
Message

re: How mad is Dylan Roof?

Posted on 7/1/15 at 8:08 pm to
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/1/15 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

Yet again, they denied the right to own them to certain persons and laws remained, that were used as a guideline for the Gun Control Act of 68 here. By Dems.


The laws allowed it for many more people to own, possess and purchase firearms.

quote:

Replace Jews, with citizens according to many on the left today.


That's retarded. Or, what you could do, is look at it like this: Aside from a small minority, they wanted plenty of people to own firearms and made it easier to do so.

Which side wants more access to firearms?

quote:

Your rendition jives nicely with Salon's assessment and rewriting of the view, by attempting to align it to today's "right wing" and conservatives.


The laws are written in history for everyone to read, and it's patently obvious that they wanted German citizens to own firearms.

You could replace Jew with Illegal Immigrant, if you wanted to make it analogous.

Also, I was in the military and sold firearms for a living for a while, I'm not anti-gun control, I'm just saying that history shows us that they were more likely to give more freedom to purchase than less to citizens.

quote:

Again, who is pushing for this "common sense" legislation and created the background check system and the 4473 forms that everyone must fill out and have kept on file for 20 yrs?


Are you for no background checks to purchase firearms? I don't think there's a person in the world who thinks that people should deal and trade firearms without any kind of paper trail.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 7/1/15 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

The laws allowed it for many more people to own, possess and purchase firearms


So long as you weren't a certain religion. Which party is attacking religion today?

quote:

Aside from a small minority, they wanted plenty of people to own firearms and made it easier to do so. Which side wants more access to firearms?


So you sayin the right wing here want's to keep blacks from owning guns today? Only one party wants to keep guns outta hands today.

quote:

The laws are written in history for everyone to read, and it's patently obvious that they wanted German citizens to own firearms.


Unless, they were Jews, no matter they were born IN GERMANY.

quote:

Also, I was in the military and sold firearms for a living for a while, I'm not anti-gun control, I'm just saying that history shows us that they were more likely to give more freedom to purchase than less to citizens.


I wasn't in the military. I did however set up an FFL for someone I used to work with, handled the application, dealt with the ATF and sold the firearms, as well as handled the audit by the ATF when it came due. I still have a C&R license for myself today. I know what laws exist and have passed as a result of Democratic control and influence and which party seeks to restrict, just as the Nazi's did against certain individuals.

quote:

Are you for no background checks to purchase firearms? I don't think there's a person in the world who thinks that people should deal and trade firearms without any kind of paper trail.


So, you think there should be paperwork for private citizen to private citizen sales? Father to son sales and gifts? If a person is not in jail, you suggest that a Constitutional Right should have a Government check up on them? Perhaps folks should have to register to give a public speech as well.

This post was edited on 7/1/15 at 8:48 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter