Started By
Message
re: Will the West be "down" this year?
Posted on 5/5/15 at 1:09 pm to kilo
Posted on 5/5/15 at 1:09 pm to kilo
Do you really feel 2015 Missouri could beat 2014 Missouri on paper?
I honestly don't, doesn't make me a idiot.
Now will your results be much different than 2014? That is debateable.
You get about as easy of a start into a schedule as possible.
So unless you lose to UCONN at home like you did Indiana last year I'd say you'll at least start 4-0.
Then you get USC and UF at home which is very nice as they are pretty comparable teams to Missouri, but homefield should get you the Wins. So you'll likely be 6-0 without having to break a sweat. Then you'll get demolished @UGA beat Vandy and get a bye before a very interesting stretch in your schedule.
Miss St
BYU
Tennessee
@Arkansas
Looks similar to some of your finishes the last couple years. You'll likely be able to lose 1 of those games and still win the East.
I think it sets up well again for Missouri EVEN though I don't think you'll be the best team in the East or as good as your 2013 or 2014 counterparts.
I honestly don't, doesn't make me a idiot.
Now will your results be much different than 2014? That is debateable.
You get about as easy of a start into a schedule as possible.
So unless you lose to UCONN at home like you did Indiana last year I'd say you'll at least start 4-0.
Then you get USC and UF at home which is very nice as they are pretty comparable teams to Missouri, but homefield should get you the Wins. So you'll likely be 6-0 without having to break a sweat. Then you'll get demolished @UGA beat Vandy and get a bye before a very interesting stretch in your schedule.
Miss St
BYU
Tennessee
@Arkansas
Looks similar to some of your finishes the last couple years. You'll likely be able to lose 1 of those games and still win the East.
I think it sets up well again for Missouri EVEN though I don't think you'll be the best team in the East or as good as your 2013 or 2014 counterparts.
1
Posted on 5/5/15 at 1:21 pm to Ericvol2096
Better at QB
Roughly the same at RB. We'll miss Murphy, but add a couple of 220lb backs to give us a different dimension.
WR would be a big question mark. Plenty of talent but light in experience.
OL roughly the same.
DL slight drop off maybe. Better at DT, but will be hard pressed to be as good at DE.
Better at LB
Better at DB
ST slight step back. Better kicking, but again we'll miss Murphy.
Roughly the same at RB. We'll miss Murphy, but add a couple of 220lb backs to give us a different dimension.
WR would be a big question mark. Plenty of talent but light in experience.
OL roughly the same.
DL slight drop off maybe. Better at DT, but will be hard pressed to be as good at DE.
Better at LB
Better at DB
ST slight step back. Better kicking, but again we'll miss Murphy.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News