Started By
Message

re: SEC Enrollment Numbers

Posted on 4/27/15 at 11:40 am to
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 4/27/15 at 11:40 am to
Literally no one likes that plan. Very dubious at being able to pull it off.
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50837 posts
Posted on 4/27/15 at 11:42 am to
Its a matter of pulling it off the right away. Acceptance standards cannot be lowered. Failout classes should not get easier. Facilities and resources should be scaled accordingly.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29180 posts
Posted on 4/27/15 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Literally no one likes that plan. Very dubious at being able to pull it off.


I mean I'm not opposed to growth of that scale if we have a plan on how to utilize it, but so far I see nothing more than a cash grab and an excuse to build shiny new top of the line buildings, and having enough cash for research and professors. Don't get me wrong I love the cosmetic transformation of the engineering part of campus, but the petroleum building was ugly, I just spent time in the computer labs. At a certain point, I want to see a plan on how to transform all these kids in to better engineers. Incentivizing people in to getting Masters, more specialized degree programs, etc etc etc. I need to see things like that, instead of just more engineering drop outs.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter