My wife is not involved in your little spat you have with Ashley.

I would NEVER vote for Ashley for any office if she ran in the state of Kentucky.

I am thinking you have issues with successful and highly educated women.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Mizzou4ever

Kansas City, Mo

Member since Nov 2011

15263 posts

Posted on 3/16/15 at 5:11 pm to WildcatMike

quote:
I would NEVER vote for Ashley for any office if she ran in the state of Kentucky.

I wouldn't either if I lived in Kentucky. I don't know how she viewed things when she was younger, but she definitely has the "hollywoodized" politics down pat. Which means she is pretty far outside the mainstream.

I still like her though, always have. She's been in some damn good movies and still think she is sexy as hell.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by piggilicious

Member since Jan 2011

37299 posts

Posted on 3/16/15 at 5:19 pm to WildcatMike

I would venture to guess I have as much actual education as Ashley does. I didn't get a 1 year masters tho- was she even required to attend anything or was it honorary? I'm not a paid actress tho so she's got that one on me, shucks.

Re earlier comments stating only far right folks had a problem with her. Looks like it was actually dems who had the problem:

quote:
That’s why Republicans liked her. A Judd candidacy promised a sort of year-long cosmic revenge on Democrats. The official GOP history of 2012 is that the party blew elections thanks to “bizarre comments” (Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal’s term) about rape. Judd was famous, and Republicans wanted to make her more so. She’d called mountaintop mining the “state-sanctioned, federal government-supported coal industry-operated rape of Appalachia.” She’d called procreation “selfish.” Chris Cillizza, the Washington Post’s Moses of political CW, has pronounced Democrats “better off without Ashley Judd” for all these reasons.

3 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board