Started By
Message

re: So the lawsuit that Chavis filed says his last day at LSU was Feb 4...

Posted on 2/27/15 at 8:14 pm to
Posted by npt817
Prairieville, LA
Member since Sep 2010
1388 posts
Posted on 2/27/15 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

MessagePosted by Agforlife
Depends on whether or not he had signed an employment contract with A&M yet or if he was just a family friend advising thar young man.


Well if he didn't sign his contract and was having contact with recruits while representing Texas A&M let the recruiting sanctions begin. And pay us our money.
Posted by marchrevin
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2009
158 posts
Posted on 2/27/15 at 9:04 pm to
The Brazos county court can render no judgement against LSU as it is a Louisiana state entity. Chavis' suit is aimed at aTm. The Texas district court can rule that aTm has to pay Chavis if Chavis has to pay LSU. But only a court in Louisiana can rule on whether or not Chavis owes the buyout to LSU. The Texas suit will only determine the obligations between aTm and Chavis, not between Chavis and LSU.
This post was edited on 2/27/15 at 9:05 pm
Posted by TheRookbird
Member since Aug 2013
1322 posts
Posted on 2/27/15 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

Well if he didn't sign his contract and was having contact with recruits while representing Texas A&M let the recruiting sanctions begin. And pay us our money.


Bebe was doing this, so we probably shouldn't throw stones from our glass house on this one. On the sanctions at least.
This post was edited on 2/27/15 at 10:19 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter