Started By
Message
re: So the lawsuit that Chavis filed says his last day at LSU was Feb 4...
Posted on 2/27/15 at 4:59 pm to Tecate
Posted on 2/27/15 at 4:59 pm to Tecate
quote:
He's not asking for reparations and there is no proof that he breached his contract based on the contract information that has been discussed.
He gave 30 Day notice on January 5. He has pictures of himself recruiting for aTm In mid January. That's breach of contract if he is still an LSU employee. If he wasn't an LSU employee at that time then his contract was terminated with over 10 months left on it, therefore he would LSU money.
4
Posted on 2/27/15 at 5:01 pm to RB10
quote:
He gave 30 Day notice on January 5. He has pictures of himself recruiting for aTm In mid January. That's breach of contract if he is still an LSU employee. If he wasn't an LSU employee at that time then his contract was terminated with over 10 months left on it, therefore he would LSU money.
Are you an attorney?
Posted on 2/27/15 at 5:43 pm to RB10
He was recruiting Michael divinity at john ehret high school for aTm in late January
Posted on 2/27/15 at 10:01 pm to RB10
quote:
He gave 30 Day notice on January 5. He has pictures of himself recruiting for aTm In mid January. That's breach of contract if he is still an LSU employee. If he wasn't an LSU employee at that time then his contract was terminated with over 10 months left on it, therefore he would LSU money.
this is the short and sweet version. chavis is going to help pay for orgeron and steele's contracts.
thanks chief
Posted on 2/28/15 at 5:19 am to RB10
quote:
So the lawsuit that Chavis filed says his last day at LSU was Feb 4...
quote:
He's not asking for reparations and there is no proof that he breached his contract based on the contract information that has been discussed.
He gave 30 Day notice on January 5. He has pictures of himself recruiting for aTm In mid January. That's breach of contract if he is still an LSU employee. If he wasn't an LSU employee at that time then his contract was terminated with over 10 months left on it, therefore he would LSU money.
You seem to be the expert around here with this mess, so I'm going to ask you. Does it matter at all if (A) Chavis didn't sign the Contract Extension, (B)Gave his resignation (30 day), and (C)was then told to hit the road by LSU brass, so they could begin looking for his replacement/recruiting with a full staff towards NSD? Would he be at fault still or would it be LSU that actually terminated his contract early, since he wanted to end it on Feb. 4th?
How does LSU justify searching (before) and officially hiring Steele on Jan. 13th? LSU had The DC position contractually obligated to Chavis still, right? Cause that's the claim being made here.
Only way I see this going is that Chavis put in his resignation, LSU said ok, "bye", and they then began to fill the vacant DC position ... Otherwise they would be violating the terms of the contract by hiring (A) extra coaches on staff or (B) making a hire for the DC spot that was still "under contract" to Chavis. Chavis and A&M would then have a great argument that LSU's actions revoked any final notice (30 day resignation) obligations regarding Chavis, since he had obviously been shown the door once Miles and LSU began looking for and signing a new DC before Chavis' contract was actually terminated, by LSU's own terms. All the while A&M never officially announced Chavis as the DC till mid February.
Thanks for your thoughts on this.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News