Started By
Message
re: Horrible ruling against LSU
Posted on 2/27/15 at 3:56 am to TutHillTiger
Posted on 2/27/15 at 3:56 am to TutHillTiger
It was a stupid ruling. LSU acted in good faith within the rules but they could not control what the kid ultimately did. They took him at his word and the player reneged.
Alabama acted within NCAA rules and contined to recruit the player. You would have to prove they acted with malice and intended to cause LSU to be sanctioned. Good luck counselor, you will need it, this isn't a company you'll be suing or an ambulance you're chasing.
Alabama acted within NCAA rules and contined to recruit the player. You would have to prove they acted with malice and intended to cause LSU to be sanctioned. Good luck counselor, you will need it, this isn't a company you'll be suing or an ambulance you're chasing.
This post was edited on 2/27/15 at 4:01 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)