Started By
Message

re: Horrible ruling against LSU

Posted on 2/26/15 at 11:21 pm to
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22215 posts
Posted on 2/26/15 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

I just don't see the point in it. Keep all contact the same until LOI or kid attends his first class for EE's.


I don't know the ins and outs, but I'd imagine some contact is necessary to make sure the kid's schedule and all is in order.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
44337 posts
Posted on 2/27/15 at 8:45 am to
quote:

I don't know the ins and outs, but I'd imagine some contact is necessary to make sure the kid's schedule and all is in order.


Womack's father is quoted saying LSU elected not to use the "allowed" extra contact, which tells me, and anyone else with any common sense, that they believed the kid wasn't solid.

What's interesting is they obviously did contact him, eventually. Again, anyone with common sense here would assume that contact was to get the ball rolling with his enrollment in classes and to get his housing squared away.

Basically, it sounds like LSU got a sanction for trying to help the kid get everything squared away to begin school in the spring.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter