Started By
Message
re: Should the NCAA let kids transfer without penalty if they can prove the a coach
Posted on 2/9/15 at 9:19 am to Patton
Posted on 2/9/15 at 9:19 am to Patton
quote:
You commit to a school not a coach. If recruits commited to a coach then that's there problem.
But that's the reality. All those 5 stars aren't committing to Alabama, the school. They're committing to Nick Saban and the Process.
However, this is an injustice that will not ever be solved as it would mean the NCAA admitting that high school athletes choose schools for athletics, not academics (which is the crux of their argument in court ATM).
Posted on 2/9/15 at 3:06 pm to tylerdurden24
Here is what I think needed to happen...
1. Allows recruits to take official visits starting in the sorting after their junior season.
2. Have an early signing period
3. If there is a HC change, and a player has signed with the school, they can be released from their signature. (I thought about also including their position coach or coordinator on the side of the ball they're going to play, but many project at multiple positions b and that would be tough to enforce. If they leave after nsd, too bad, just like now.
1. Allows recruits to take official visits starting in the sorting after their junior season.
2. Have an early signing period
3. If there is a HC change, and a player has signed with the school, they can be released from their signature. (I thought about also including their position coach or coordinator on the side of the ball they're going to play, but many project at multiple positions b and that would be tough to enforce. If they leave after nsd, too bad, just like now.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)