Started By
Message

re: Terrance Cody's agent responds to animal cruelty investigation

Posted on 1/23/15 at 4:24 pm to
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26999 posts
Posted on 1/23/15 at 4:24 pm to
What smells like bullshite is the attorney's response. Worms? WTF? If that was all there was to the story, law enforcement never would have even become aware of the situation.

The only way the dog dying of worms would result in an investigation would be if Cody had refused to have the dog treated over a period of time...possibly involving frequent vomiting and diarrhea, weight loss, etc...and the dog's health deteriorated to the point where Cody had obviously neglected him. A dog doesn't just get worms one day and drop dead.

"He loves this dog. Why would he have the dog treated otherwise?"

Does this guy even have a clue how bad the situation would have gotten before the dog would have died? How long a dog would have to suffer before actually dying?

I don't know if Cody is guilty of anything or not, but sometimes the best thing for moronic lawyers to do is to keep their mouths shut.
This post was edited on 1/23/15 at 4:46 pm
Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
16060 posts
Posted on 1/23/15 at 4:59 pm to
I thought the attorney gave a good response. What facts do you have that indicate he is wrong?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter