Started By
Message
re: Comparing the 4 CFB Playoff teams statistically head-to-head
Posted on 12/26/14 at 7:02 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
Posted on 12/26/14 at 7:02 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:
S.E.C. Crazy
Comparing the 4 CFB Playoff teams statistically head-to-head
If you think the Big 10 is better than the Big 12 then you are dumb as a rock.
The difference isn't nearly as wide as you make it sound. There are two or three good teams at the top of each conference, shite at the bottom, and mediocrity in between. Kansas and Iowa State are pure, steaming shite. And the problem with the Big 12 and their whole "we play everybody" mantra, is that teams like TCU and Baylor get to play every one of the shitty teams in the conference every year. OSU's two cross divisional games were against teams .500 or better.
Posted on 12/26/14 at 7:26 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
OSU's two cross divisional games were against teams .500 or better.
at the time of your post Illinois had lost to La Tech and is now 6-7.
Iowa st beat Iowa AT Iowa. the conferences are, in fact, not close. I grew up in Champaign Illinois, I follow the big 10 as well as the big 12. seriously, Ohio St is miles ahead of the rest of the big 10, but the rest of the conference is (ok mich st is decent) so ungodly awful that it really doesnt mean anything. Ohio st lost AT HOME to VIRGINIA TECH. The big 10 conference's best win this entire year was indiana beating mizzou.
none of the "good" big 10 teams won games against legit top 25 teams in non-conference.
This post was edited on 12/26/14 at 7:27 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)