Started By
Message

re: Comparing the 4 CFB Playoff teams statistically head-to-head

Posted on 12/26/14 at 7:02 pm to
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26999 posts
Posted on 12/26/14 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

S.E.C. Crazy
Comparing the 4 CFB Playoff teams statistically head-to-head
If you think the Big 10 is better than the Big 12 then you are dumb as a rock.


The difference isn't nearly as wide as you make it sound. There are two or three good teams at the top of each conference, shite at the bottom, and mediocrity in between. Kansas and Iowa State are pure, steaming shite. And the problem with the Big 12 and their whole "we play everybody" mantra, is that teams like TCU and Baylor get to play every one of the shitty teams in the conference every year. OSU's two cross divisional games were against teams .500 or better.
Posted by BearBait09
Texas
Member since Aug 2013
2307 posts
Posted on 12/26/14 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

OSU's two cross divisional games were against teams .500 or better.



at the time of your post Illinois had lost to La Tech and is now 6-7.

Iowa st beat Iowa AT Iowa. the conferences are, in fact, not close. I grew up in Champaign Illinois, I follow the big 10 as well as the big 12. seriously, Ohio St is miles ahead of the rest of the big 10, but the rest of the conference is (ok mich st is decent) so ungodly awful that it really doesnt mean anything. Ohio st lost AT HOME to VIRGINIA TECH. The big 10 conference's best win this entire year was indiana beating mizzou.

none of the "good" big 10 teams won games against legit top 25 teams in non-conference.

This post was edited on 12/26/14 at 7:27 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter