Started By
Message
re: Do these "The U" documentaries even mention the Bama beat down?
Posted on 12/15/14 at 9:49 am to Crowknowsbest
Posted on 12/15/14 at 9:49 am to Crowknowsbest
The real question is, why continue making these documentaries when Nebraska had a better dynasty in the same time frame that wasn't exclusively the result of cheating?
3
Posted on 12/15/14 at 9:51 am to CrimsonCrusade
quote:
The real question is, why continue making these documentaries when Nebraska had a better dynasty in the same time frame that wasn't exclusively the result of cheating?
A documentary about Miami gets a lot more viewers than a documentary about Nebraska. Controversy is interesting.
Posted on 12/15/14 at 9:51 am to CrimsonCrusade
quote:
why continue making these documentaries when Nebraska had a better dynasty in the same time frame that wasn't exclusively the result of cheating?
because that would be boring.
They make these U documentaries not just to showcase how great a team is, they made them because it had outlaws running the team, money scandals, former athletes paying current players, rogue boosters funneling tons of illegally gotten funds to the program, etc. That's entertaining. Watching a documentary about corn fed white boys in Nebraska beating up on people would be lame.
Posted on 12/15/14 at 2:35 pm to CrimsonCrusade
The real question is, why continue making these documentaries when Nebraska had a better dynasty in the same time frame that wasn't exclusively the result of cheating?
Don't kid yourself. The Husker program was every bit as dirty as the U, and probably worse. The historical whitewash on Dr Tom - one of the biggest hypocrites in college football history - is mind boggling.
Don't kid yourself. The Husker program was every bit as dirty as the U, and probably worse. The historical whitewash on Dr Tom - one of the biggest hypocrites in college football history - is mind boggling.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News