Started By
Message

re: Defensive fundamentals or scheme: what are you more excited for?

Posted on 12/13/14 at 9:39 am to
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37708 posts
Posted on 12/13/14 at 9:39 am to
Fundamentals. It wasn't Johnson's 4-2-5 that failed but the implementation. 4-2-5 is alive and well all over the country and run by some of the most successful defenses
Posted by AUNashville
New Haven
Member since Jul 2014
3561 posts
Posted on 12/13/14 at 9:46 am to
Fundamentals...

No dumb mistakes, no holding my breath every pass play knowing there's a good chance one of our DBs blew coverage harder than Kim Kardashian.
Posted by Warfarer
Dothan, AL
Member since May 2010
12136 posts
Posted on 12/13/14 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Fundamentals. It wasn't Johnson's 4-2-5 that failed but the implementation. 4-2-5 is alive and well all over the country and run by some of the most successful defenses



I couldn't agree more. The 4-2-5 is a great scheme concept that is really flexible but our defense seriously lacks discipline and fundamentals and has since Chizik took over. I am just hoping that Muschamp instills discipline and has our defense taking good angles and form tackling. Would be great to see again.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter