Started By
Message
re: Why doesn't the SEC consider renaming the divisions to North and South
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:47 pm to mizzoukills
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:47 pm to mizzoukills
I've been in favor of annually realigning divisions based on the previous season's records. It makes sense. Leaving divisions as is without regard to performance is actually quite antiquated. True, you never know for sure how a team will perform the next season, but realigning the divisions makes just as much sense as leaving them the same, IMO.
3
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:48 pm to Smalls
realignment every year? damn...that would be a nightmare to figure out.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:49 pm to Smalls
How many conferences in college or professional leagues change division members depending on perceived strength?
You say the way it is in antiquated so you must be on the cutting edge because no one else but soccer figs in Europe do anything close to what you are suggesting.
It actually makes sense only to some LSU fans.
You say the way it is in antiquated so you must be on the cutting edge because no one else but soccer figs in Europe do anything close to what you are suggesting.
It actually makes sense only to some LSU fans.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 7:16 pm to Smalls
quote:
I've been in favor of annually realigning divisions based on the previous season's records. It makes sense. Leaving divisions as is without regard to performance is actually quite antiquated. True, you never know for sure how a team will perform the next season, but realigning the divisions makes just as much sense as leaving them the same, IMO.
I've been advocating a rotating schedule. if the rivalry games have to be played every year you could still work the schedule around those games.
Would basically end OOC and you could still take the best two teams for a championship if needed.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News