Started By
Message
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:46 am to TheJoseyWales
quote:
that was a weak targeting call
You must be joking. That hit was as dirty as it gets.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:49 am to TheJoseyWales
Definite targeting call, even the Mizzou coaches in the booth said it was.
LINK
quote:
Missouri coach Gary Pinkel said some members of the Tigers' staff agreed with the call.
"Up top our coaches said that -- I think he had the crown of the head. That's what I was told," he said. "Our coaches upstairs saw it, and they agreed with it. So that's what it was."
LINK
This post was edited on 12/7/14 at 9:51 am
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:50 am to TheJoseyWales
Moral loss. Excellent.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:52 am to Sabear
quote:
Hell it was one of if not the worst I've ever seen
No. The hit on David Greene was worse.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:52 am to TheJoseyWales
It was likely a fumble, it was definitely targeting (Ray was trying to put Sims out of the game) and it was certainly a pick. Doesn't matter , score wasn't even close.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:54 am to HailFreezusOver
Please, Old Miss don't reply. The last time we played you we beech slapped your arse at your house.... MIZ!
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:56 am to TheJoseyWales
I don't like targeting or horse collar rules. The hit was a penalty no doubt, I disagree with the ejection part. Chop block doesn't result in ejection and is as likely or more likely to result in serious injury.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:57 am to TheJoseyWales
The whistle blew on the fumble
The hit was illegal and your coach even said so
The out bounds call? Meh.....
You're a melty little bitch.
The hit was illegal and your coach even said so
The out bounds call? Meh.....
You're a melty little bitch.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:58 am to Rantavious
The targeting of JJ in 2010(?) was worse - and not called.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:58 am to TheJoseyWales
quote:
Sorry but he led with his hands did not hit him with the crown of his helmet.
Well that's not true, but even if it were:
quote:
Targeting and Initiating Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player (Rule 9-1-4)
No player shall target and initiate contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, fist, elbow or shoulder. When in question, it is a foul. (Rule 2-27-14)
Note: Beginning in 2013, ejection from the game is a part of the penalty for violation of both Rule 9-1-3 and Rule 9-1-4.
Do you even football, bro?
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:06 am to 14&Counting
I'm a melty bitch? I'm not the one kissing Bama's arse...
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:06 am to TheJoseyWales
42-13
Am I doing it right?
Am I doing it right?
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:07 am to TheJoseyWales
Had all that stuff gone Mizzou's way
It would've still been close to the same outcome
It would've still been close to the same outcome
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:08 am to 82fumanchu
Yes you are..... But it was a game for 3 quarters and a little less ref help would have went a long way....
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:09 am to TheJoseyWales
Was never a game. Methodical beat down, Saban's M.O.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:10 am to TheJoseyWales
quote:
But it was a game for 3 quarters
...yeah not so much
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:10 am to nc14
quote:Knee injuries aren't nearly on the same level as brain injuries.
Chop block doesn't result in ejection and is as likely or more likely to result in serious injury.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News