Started By
Message
re: Not an FSU fan but...
Posted on 12/6/14 at 4:02 am to Mohican
Posted on 12/6/14 at 4:02 am to Mohican
quote:
On top of that, FSU played not one, but TWO marquee non-conference games
Whoah whoah whoah slow your motherfrickin roll dude.
You can't argue 2 marquee games if they weren't ranked at the end of the season. Your argument is invalid and if FSU was in the Big 12 , PAC 12 or SEC they would have 3 losses. FACT.
1
Posted on 12/6/14 at 7:03 am to ironsides
quote:
Whoah whoah whoah slow your motherfrickin roll dude.
You can't argue 2 marquee games if they weren't ranked at the end of the season.
Everything is relative. A non-conference slate of Oklahoma State, Notre Dame and Florida is much, much better on the whole than Samford, Minnesota, and SMU. Or even WVU, Florida Atlantic, and Western Carolina. The committee said it would heavily favor the non-conference schedule and that doesn't seem to be the case in dealing with FSU.
You can argue the semantics of the word "marquee" all you want but it doesn't refute the point.
quote:
Your argument is invalid and if FSU was in the Big 12 , PAC 12 or SEC they would have 3 losses. FACT.
That is purely speculation. Is that what you want the committee to go on? Speculation? I have a hard time with a group of people deciding that how a team wins is more important than the other criteria I listed. It's a joke, actually.
This post was edited on 12/6/14 at 7:07 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News