Started By
Message

re: Missouri Confederate Forces Were 1st to Kill Union General in Civil War

Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:09 pm to
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Are you trying to brag about starting the worst conflict in American History, then only participating in it slightly?


They didn't even start it. The Battle of Wilson's Creek wasn't even the first major battle of the Civil War. Missouri supplied far more troops to the Union than they did the Confederacy, the state itself remained within the Union for the duration of the war, and of all the states within the Southeastern Conference, Missouri is probably the least southern of all of them.

Also...years before Missouri got itself involved in Bleeding Kansas, South Carolina came very close to seceding from the Union during the Nullification Crisis of 1832.
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25911 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:10 pm to
quote:




Was SC fighting the Civil War in 1855?


Mizzou fans really believe their family feud with Kansas was a part of the Civil War?
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37973 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:12 pm to
Why did the Missouri government, way back in 2008-2009, file the MIAC Strategic Report basically stating all Southerners are terrorists? LINK

And why does the Missouri Militia call themselves The Gamecocks?

Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Missouri is probably the least southern of all of them.



Who are you referring to when you say "all of them"?
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:15 pm to
Meh.

Missouri is just a part of Louisiana:

Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:19 pm to
theGarnetWay

quote:

Mizzou fans really believe their family feud with Kansas was a part of the Civil War?



Several historians believe that, sooooo......yes!
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

And why does the Missouri Militia call themselves The Gamecocks?




Good question! I don't know. Have you been organizing terrorists in Missouri, Scrooster?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

Who are you referring to when you say "all of them"?



South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Arkansas, Tennessee and Kentucky.
Posted by LSU Tigerhead
Metairie
Member since Nov 2007
4962 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:29 pm to
Cripes man, the UNITED STATES NEVER HAD A CIVIL WAR!
Why does everyone get this wrong?

It's The War Between the States

or

The War of Northern Agression

There never was a civil war.
Posted by Porky
Member since Aug 2008
19103 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

This jayhawk sympathizer was single handedly responsible for a massacre in St. Louis that involved normal citizens that were upset that he held Missouri militia members as prisoners of war.

Were they really normal?

Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Arkansas, Tennessee and Kentucky.



So you admit Missouri is southern! Case closed.
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

The War Between the States


I think the war between the states is the most accurate explanation for what it truly was. Shelby Foote has a good quote about it something like "before the war, people when talking about the nation as a whole would say 'The United States are,' after the war, people would say 'The United States is.'"

But alas, the history gets written by the victors. Always has, always will
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67524 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Florida

Posted by roadhouse
Chicago
Member since Sep 2013
2703 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:38 pm to
LOL. Everyone hates Civil War posts but these things always go to 10 pages.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Florida



Posted by roadhouse
Chicago
Member since Sep 2013
2703 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

least southern


How would you define "southern" ?
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:40 pm to
sweet tea
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

How would you define "southern"


If all of Missouri was like Cape Girardeau, Missouri would be the South.
Posted by arkyhawk
SWMO
Member since Jan 2013
8116 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:49 pm to
Congrats on losing the Civil War



Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

If all of Missouri was like Cape Girardeau, Missouri would be the South.




All of Missouri is more southern than all "southern" states. We've retained and embraced our "southern heritage" throughout the years.

The "south", on the other hand, has not. Y'all have been yankeefied.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter