Started By
Message
re: Was Big 12 football better than the SEC?
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:36 pm to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:36 pm to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
24-14 followed immediately by 37-21. I may be from Texas, but the Big 12 sucks the cow-shite it produces.
This post was edited on 12/5/14 at 11:37 pm
0
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:04 am to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:34 am to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
Missouri has taken advantage of an obviously-down SEC East the last 2 seasons. What success has aTm had exactly? 
zou fans getting the excuses ready
quote:
doubt y'all's refs will allow that to happen with so much on the line.
zou fans getting the excuses ready
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:37 am to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
I don't know who's alter you are but you suck at it. Just give it up. 
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:42 am to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
Can you check the OOC and bowl game results between the 2 conferences for the last 5 years and get back to us? TIA.. 
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:55 am to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
quote:
Seems both Texas A&M and Missouri are having more success in the SEC than they did in the Big 12.
Conference Records since joining the SEC 3 years ago:
Mizzou: 16-8
aTm: 13-11
The previous 3 years in the Big 12 before coming to the SEC:
Mizzou: 16-10
aTm: 13-12
I would say both of you have accomplished the same, Mizzou has just had the benefit of playing a favorable SECW schedule the past 2 years (Arky and aTm in 14, OM and aTm in 13)
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News