Started By
Message
re: Winning the SEC East back to back is easy, the West, not so much
Posted on 12/1/14 at 7:27 pm to IAmReality
Posted on 12/1/14 at 7:27 pm to IAmReality
Here is the underlying thing that all the posts like this mask though:
Any Rant poster who says they ever thought Mizzou would win back to back division titles of any kind, ever, when they joined the SEC is completely bullshitting. Completely.
The fact the discourse has shifted to listing and comparing Mizzou accomplishements to past accomplishments of UF, UGA and UT suits me just fine.
Any Rant poster who says they ever thought Mizzou would win back to back division titles of any kind, ever, when they joined the SEC is completely bullshitting. Completely.
The fact the discourse has shifted to listing and comparing Mizzou accomplishements to past accomplishments of UF, UGA and UT suits me just fine.
This post was edited on 12/1/14 at 7:29 pm
1
Posted on 12/1/14 at 7:33 pm to Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
quote:
Any Rant poster who says they ever thought Mizzou would win back to back division titles of any kind, ever, when they joined the SEC is completely bullshitting. Completely.
To be fair, M basketball does not have divisions, but the early chatter indicated an early dominance by Mizzou in this sport which of course did not happen.
Here is the bigger question...
Was it better or worse for Mizzou to lose to Auburn last year? Say Mizzou beat Auburn then got beat up by Free Shoes U. Would Mizzou taken more heat for being the school to break the SEC dominance chain?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News