Started By
Message
re: If everyone wins out still in contention, will the committee really
Posted on 11/26/14 at 10:01 am to DynastyDawg
Posted on 11/26/14 at 10:01 am to DynastyDawg
quote:
ctually they definitely would be the division co-champion
Which is for losers. Who would play in atlanta? That's your division champion.
quote:
the same principle as only being the co-champion of the conference
except being co-champ of a conference holds about 50x more weight than co-champ of a division.
Division you play the other 6 teams plus 2 others, and in this case MSU would have lost head to head to the actual division champ. A conference co-champ, since there is no CG, has played every other team in the league.
1
Posted on 11/26/14 at 10:07 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Which is for losers
Ooops, I thought I was talking to an adult. I guess that doesn't work for your narrative so you comeback with "which is for losers". LOL
quote:
in this case MSU would have lost head to head to the actual division champ
So in this case, TCU lost to Baylor. So then why don't they just give the crown to Baylor? You can't be serious. You are chasing your tail like a dumbass dog. The co-champ shite works when you want it to, but doesn't when it doesn't fit your agenda. Got it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News