re: If everyone wins out still in contention, will the committee really

quote:

---

I think maybe you're a little jelly

---

oops I thought I was talking to an adult

quote:

---

poor UGA can't win when it counts

---

will you say this when we're playing for the SECCG and you're not? Both teams have losses, therefore, we both lost when it counted.

quote:

---

you have to discredit our body of work.

---

Read the fricking OP. He was asking about a scenario and I gave rational, fact based responses to it. I wouldn't be able to discredit MSU if the things I said weren't actually true.

quote:

---

Case in point, Kirk H. was the most avid supporter of Alabama in 2011, yet uses every opportunity to talk about how Ohio State is the better team this year of the 1 loss teams.

---

Situations aren't even remotely similar, which I can explain to you if needed but don't feel like typing it out in this post.

quote:

---

People like marquee names, so lets just call a spade a spade and stop trying to sugar coat it like they are.

---

MSU deserved their #1 ranking without any doubt when they had it, it has nothing to do with names. If OSU wins out, I think they would have a better resume for the 4th spot based on games played.

quote:

---

Please WG.

---

MSU's 2 losses are to Oregon (ranked 2nd) and OSU (ranked 6th). Forgive me for thinking that shitty lsu, arkansas, and auburn teams would probably lose to them. Hell, UGA is ranked behind MSU and we beat the shite out of 2 of those 3 teams.

quote:

---

I'm simply pointing out that the team you are trashing,

---

I realize your crimson shades are blinding you from reality, but I'm not "trashing" msu. I'm saying OSU would have a better resume than them if they win their conference. And that'd be pretty hard to refute.