Started By
Message
re: If Hugh Freeze had not landed Laremy Tunsil - would he still be HC @ OM?
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:37 am to Eric Nies Grind Time
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:37 am to Eric Nies Grind Time
Hugh will be hard to fire. He's an Archie endorsed OM homeboy.
0
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:37 am to DrunkenStuporMan
quote:
I'm not ok with us losing but I am ecstatic that we have won the number of games we have after going 2-10 3 years ago.
I can understand this.
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:39 am to SouthMSReb
It's quite ironic that Hugh was supposed to be the offensive savior, but the defense is carrying the team while the offense shits the bed.
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:41 am to DynastyDawg
Then you can understand that any objective person can step back and say that where we are is great and even if we were not playing as well as we have been it would still be a major improvement over Nutt's last year.
That motherfricker ruined 2 of my 4 seasons as a student.
That motherfricker ruined 2 of my 4 seasons as a student.
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:44 am to DynastyDawg
Yeah it sucks pretty bad. I'm withholding judgement until next year when he has all of his recruits playing.
Still don't like the approach to the run game...
Still don't like the approach to the run game...
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:46 am to Eric Nies Grind Time
Pretty sure Tunsil didn't start the Vandy game although he played a good bit...
Their OL situation is a funny one, in that most of us saw it coming from a mile away, although they argued with me about it from 2012-fall practice. When a preceding coach misses on the position for multiple years, you never adequately fill that gap regardless of how well you recruit. You can afford to miss on one year but not two, and for all intents and purposes, Nutt missed on 3...
Their OL situation is a funny one, in that most of us saw it coming from a mile away, although they argued with me about it from 2012-fall practice. When a preceding coach misses on the position for multiple years, you never adequately fill that gap regardless of how well you recruit. You can afford to miss on one year but not two, and for all intents and purposes, Nutt missed on 3...
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:49 am to DrunkenStuporMan
quote:
That motherfricker ruined 2 of my 4 seasons as a student.
PLS. I was in school during the croom years.
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:49 am to engie
quote:
When a preceding coach misses on the position for multiple years, you never adequately fill that gap regardless of how well you recruit. You can afford to miss on one year but not two, and for all intents and purposes, Nutt missed on 3...
And Hevesy isn't walking into that meeting room in Oxford.
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:50 am to DrunkenStuporMan
quote:
Nutt
Uh, well, before him was Ogeron so.....
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:52 am to TxTiger82
Ruined all of my trips to Oxford during highschool. And his psychological imbalance was more fun than Nutt's.
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:55 am to DynastyDawg
Matt Luke is an excellent OL coach. I hope they are as impatient as they seem and use him as a scapegoat...
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:56 am to engie
Maybe Hugh has not fired Luke because he realized he would not have a job without Tunsil.
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:57 am to Eric Nies Grind Time
I really don't get your argument.
Would dan have a job without Dak?
Would dan have a job without Dak?
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:57 am to SouthMSReb
quote:
Would dan have a job without Dak?
That happens all of the time with QB's. Not so much with an offensive tackle. So I find it more interesting.
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:59 am to Eric Nies Grind Time
Fair enough.
Posted on 10/28/14 at 9:50 am to Eric Nies Grind Time
Yes.
We would have been fine with McCray last season(as we were in 2012 with him).
We would be 6-2 right now without Tunsil and would end the season 7-5, maybe 8-4.
Freeze would still have a job.
Plus, had Tunsil not come, Golson would still be here and we would have signed Dan Skipper. We would have been okay.
We would have been fine with McCray last season(as we were in 2012 with him).
We would be 6-2 right now without Tunsil and would end the season 7-5, maybe 8-4.
Freeze would still have a job.
Plus, had Tunsil not come, Golson would still be here and we would have signed Dan Skipper. We would have been okay.
Posted on 10/28/14 at 9:50 am to Eric Nies Grind Time
Yes. Freeze was getting five years regardless.
Posted on 10/28/14 at 9:55 am to DMagic
quote:
Freeze was getting five years regardless.
Is he still getting 5 years regardless?
Posted on 10/28/14 at 9:57 am to DynastyDawg
Well yeah. I meant even if didn't go to a bowl the past two years then he'd still get five. If years 3,4,5 were all bowl less then we would've tried again with another coach but that would've been the only way to get rid of him.
Posted on 10/28/14 at 10:00 am to DMagic
Hell, we gave Croom 5 years.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News