Started By
Message

re: QB rotation 'possible,' says Richt...

Posted on 9/30/14 at 9:55 am to
Posted by K9
wayx....BOBO IN '19
Member since Sep 2012
24260 posts
Posted on 9/30/14 at 9:55 am to
quote:

the reason for that is because the backups are CLEARLY better than the former starters. We dont' have that situation here.



we don't know that for sure.
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 9/30/14 at 10:14 am to
quote:

we don't know that for sure.


This. And I have been making the JT III = Mason comparison too. The QB stable isn't the same, that we know of, but Mason IS JT III.

Also,

This post was edited on 9/30/14 at 10:15 am
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86599 posts
Posted on 9/30/14 at 10:22 am to
quote:

we don't know that for sure.


LSU- both QBs have played a fair amount, the FR looks better.

clemson-both have played a good bit, the freshman is head and shoulders better.

That was my point...in those cases both QBs had a good amount of reps and the FR happened to be better. We are not in that situation because our freshman doesn't have the reps.

I'll also point out that Watson looked badass against us, and almost beat FSU. Jennings has looked far better than the other dude at LSU. The limited time Ramsey has had he has looked very inconsistent. Potential for some beautiful throws, then potential to throw a rope directly at a DB with no reciever within 15 yards.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter