re: The SEC's legal duty to protect the health of its athletes

Let's say that the SEC gives the Mississippi State player a one game suspension. Then say five games later that same player stomps on another player again. This time he ruptures the player spleen or causes a small bowel perforation, either of which could lead to death.

And for arguments sake, this player who is injured has to go into surgery and dies in surgery.

Would not the players family have a lawsuit against the SEC for allowing someone with a history of repeated injury against opponents to play? It is clear in my mind that this player is a habitual renegade player Who goes out of his way to injure his opponents. If the SEC allows him to play again they are condoning this behavior. Especially considering he has already been punished for the same behavior before