re: Is the West really THAT much better than the East?

I'm not even a fan of the SEC. This is my observation, and for the past couple of years the SEC West has won the SECCG. Imagine Mizzou playing in the SEC West. I'll give you Tamu, because of last year's result, but I just don't see you guys beating Bama, Auburn, LSU when those games are all pretty close to each other.

quote:

---

So you're saying a team that barely beat West Virginia and a team that escaped Wisconsin and should have honestly lost has no chance to lose to the SC, Georgia or Mizzou.

---

So sick of hearing shite like this. YOU line up and play a hyped matchup at a neutral site against a team who has been preparing all offseason for you. All Wisky had to do was beat us and it was downhill for them with a shot at the playoff. That game was their season.

Yet we had a bunch of freshmen go out there and grow up on the national stage.

I hate Bama, but same for them. A huge question mark at qb against a foe that ALWAYS brings it for the SEC.

First game of the season where anything can happen and BOTH teams got the W. Speaks to just how good they are even when not at their prime. Both those teams are getting better each week and will be SEC Goliaths as always by the time they face off. Meanwhile, Georgia will continue to be Charlie Brown, flip a coin for which Spurrier team shows up, Florida... nope. Good news is Mizzou will probably win the division again this year.

Good luck against..... Indiana.