Started By
Message
re: Richt Gets Response from SEC Officials
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:20 pm to DawgsLife
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:20 pm to DawgsLife
I think it was just one of those calls that could literally be argued both ways to death.
And I know CMR (understandably) tried, but there is no reviewing that. It's just not possible.
And I know CMR (understandably) tried, but there is no reviewing that. It's just not possible.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:26 pm to CNB
quote:
I think it was just one of those calls that could literally be argued both ways to death.
And I know CMR (understandably) tried, but there is no reviewing that. It's just not possible.
True. The referees have a few seconds to make decisions. League offices can tear film apart to determine a correct call. Bad calls happen to everybody, and generally they even out. It cost us in this game. Hopefully it will even out later in the season. All the finger pointing and arguing in the world doesn't change the call or make us the winner. It goes down as a "W" for South Carolina. Time to move on and look to the next 2 1/2 months of football we have left.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:39 pm to CNB
If Saban tried to argue this you'd call him a crybaby and accuse Bama of trying to cheat and change the rules.
"The SEC office is in Birmingham!"
Move on. Georgia had plenty of chances to win and pissed it away. It's kind of sad, frankly.
"The SEC office is in Birmingham!"
Move on. Georgia had plenty of chances to win and pissed it away. It's kind of sad, frankly.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 5:06 pm to CNB
I agree had it been a foot short it would not have mattered because there was no clear shot of the ball and where forward momentum ceased. Richt had to challenge though it was his last chance to stay in the game. That is the way it happens sometimes and if the situation were turned around we would be arguing with the Gamecocks as to why it was a first down
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News