Started By
Message
The new NC selection process is very flawed.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:18 am
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:18 am
The new selection process has inherent conflicts of interest, as it concerns two members of the selection committee (Pat Haden and Oliver Luck). Despite the so-called recusal requirement, who thought putting active ADs on the selection committee was a good idea anyway? What happened to avoiding the appearance of impropriety? Is it really recusal, from both the discussion and the voting, or is it only absention from the voting? It should be the former, not the latter.
Haden and Luck have conflicts of interest, not
only to their respective schools, but also to their respective conferences. If one or both of them don't recognize this and act accordingly, is there a process to compel recusal?
Keeping the BCS's selection process, but having a 4-team playoff system to determine the NC, would be much, much better.
Haden and Luck have conflicts of interest, not
only to their respective schools, but also to their respective conferences. If one or both of them don't recognize this and act accordingly, is there a process to compel recusal?
Keeping the BCS's selection process, but having a 4-team playoff system to determine the NC, would be much, much better.
11
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:18 am to JdbsLSUBR
Such a good topic, had to post it on two boards.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:19 am to JdbsLSUBR
Offseason is over
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:20 am to JdbsLSUBR
Not to mention Condoleeza Rice is gump and probably can't even tell you the difference between a nickel and dime defense.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:20 am to JdbsLSUBR
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:21 am to JdbsLSUBR
I see the hook 
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:21 am to Riseupfromtherubble
Condi knows her football tho
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:22 am to JdbsLSUBR
Should have kept BCS and just take top 4 teams
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:30 am to Nado Jenkins83
These individuals disagree.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:32 am to JdbsLSUBR
The coaches poll is no longer a direct determinant of championship participants.
your argument is invalid.
your argument is invalid.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:33 am to JdbsLSUBR
Absention? Impropriety? Recusal?
You must be a lawyer.
You must be a lawyer.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:39 am to JdbsLSUBR
Using the BCS system this is how the playoffs wouldve looked... Do you agree with these outcomes?
1998
#1 12-0 Tennessee vs. #4 10-1 Ohio State
#2 11-1 Florida State vs. 11-1 #3 Kansas State
Left out: #5 UCLA 10-1
1999
#1 11-0 Florida State vs. #4 10-2 Alabama
#2 11-0 Virginia Tech vs. #3 11-1 Nebraska
Left out: #5 9-2 Tennessee
2000
#1 12-0 Oklahoma vs. #4 10-1 Washington
#2 11-1 Florida State vs. #3 10-1 Miami
Left out: #5 10-1 Virginia Tech
2001
#1 12-0 Miami vs. #4 10-1 Oregon
#2 11-1 Nebraska vs. #3 10-2 Colorado
Left out: #5 9-2 Florida
2002
#1 12-0 Miami vs. #4 10-2 Southern Cal
#2 13-0 Ohio State vs. #3 12-1 Georgia
Left out: #5 11-1 Iowa
2003
#1 12-1 Oklahoma vs. #4 10-2 Michigan
#2 12-1 LSU vs. #3 11-1 Southern Cal
Left out: #5 10-2 Ohio State
2004
#1 12-0 Southern Cal vs. #4 10-1 Texas
#2 12-0 Oklahoma vs. #3 12-0 Auburn
Left out: #5 10-1 California (Also, 11-0 Utah)
2005
#1 12-0 Southern Cal vs. #4 9-2 Ohio State
#2 12-0 Texas vs. #3 10-1 Penn State
Left out: #5 10-1 Oregon
2006
#1 12-0 Ohio State vs. #4 10-2 LSU
#2 12-1 Florida vs. #3 11-1 Michigan
Left out: #5 10-2 USC
2007
#1 11-1 Ohio State vs. #4 11-2 Oklahoma
#2 11-2 LSU vs. #3 11-2 Virginia Tech
Left out: #5 Georgia 10-2
2008
#1 12-1 Oklahoma vs. #4 11-1 Alabama
#2 12-1 Florida vs. #3 12-1 Texas
Left out: #5 USC 11-1 (Also, #6 12-0 Utah and #8 12-0 Boise State)
2009
#1 13-0 Alabama vs. #4 12-0 TCU
#2 13-0 Texas vs. #3 12-0 Cincinnati
Left out: #5 12-1 Florida (Also, #6 Boise State 13-0)
2010
#1 13-0 Auburn vs. #4 12-0 Stanford
#2 12-0 Oregon vs. #3 11-1 TCU
Left out #5: 11-1 Wisconsin
2011
#1 13-0 LSU vs. #4 11-1 Stanford
#2 11-1 Alabama vs. #3 11-1 Oklahoma State
Left out #5: 11-2 Oregon
2012
#1 12-0 Notre Dame vs #4 11-1 Florida
#2 Alabama 12-1 vs #3 12-0 Ohio State
Left out #5: 11-1 Oregon
2013
#1 13-0 Florida State vs #4 11-1 Michigan State
#2 Auburn 12-1 vs #3 11-1 Alabama
Left out #5: 11-2 Stanford
1998
#1 12-0 Tennessee vs. #4 10-1 Ohio State
#2 11-1 Florida State vs. 11-1 #3 Kansas State
Left out: #5 UCLA 10-1
1999
#1 11-0 Florida State vs. #4 10-2 Alabama
#2 11-0 Virginia Tech vs. #3 11-1 Nebraska
Left out: #5 9-2 Tennessee
2000
#1 12-0 Oklahoma vs. #4 10-1 Washington
#2 11-1 Florida State vs. #3 10-1 Miami
Left out: #5 10-1 Virginia Tech
2001
#1 12-0 Miami vs. #4 10-1 Oregon
#2 11-1 Nebraska vs. #3 10-2 Colorado
Left out: #5 9-2 Florida
2002
#1 12-0 Miami vs. #4 10-2 Southern Cal
#2 13-0 Ohio State vs. #3 12-1 Georgia
Left out: #5 11-1 Iowa
2003
#1 12-1 Oklahoma vs. #4 10-2 Michigan
#2 12-1 LSU vs. #3 11-1 Southern Cal
Left out: #5 10-2 Ohio State
2004
#1 12-0 Southern Cal vs. #4 10-1 Texas
#2 12-0 Oklahoma vs. #3 12-0 Auburn
Left out: #5 10-1 California (Also, 11-0 Utah)
2005
#1 12-0 Southern Cal vs. #4 9-2 Ohio State
#2 12-0 Texas vs. #3 10-1 Penn State
Left out: #5 10-1 Oregon
2006
#1 12-0 Ohio State vs. #4 10-2 LSU
#2 12-1 Florida vs. #3 11-1 Michigan
Left out: #5 10-2 USC
2007
#1 11-1 Ohio State vs. #4 11-2 Oklahoma
#2 11-2 LSU vs. #3 11-2 Virginia Tech
Left out: #5 Georgia 10-2
2008
#1 12-1 Oklahoma vs. #4 11-1 Alabama
#2 12-1 Florida vs. #3 12-1 Texas
Left out: #5 USC 11-1 (Also, #6 12-0 Utah and #8 12-0 Boise State)
2009
#1 13-0 Alabama vs. #4 12-0 TCU
#2 13-0 Texas vs. #3 12-0 Cincinnati
Left out: #5 12-1 Florida (Also, #6 Boise State 13-0)
2010
#1 13-0 Auburn vs. #4 12-0 Stanford
#2 12-0 Oregon vs. #3 11-1 TCU
Left out #5: 11-1 Wisconsin
2011
#1 13-0 LSU vs. #4 11-1 Stanford
#2 11-1 Alabama vs. #3 11-1 Oklahoma State
Left out #5: 11-2 Oregon
2012
#1 12-0 Notre Dame vs #4 11-1 Florida
#2 Alabama 12-1 vs #3 12-0 Ohio State
Left out #5: 11-1 Oregon
2013
#1 13-0 Florida State vs #4 11-1 Michigan State
#2 Auburn 12-1 vs #3 11-1 Alabama
Left out #5: 11-2 Stanford
Posted on 9/10/14 at 2:33 pm to JdbsLSUBR
quote:
Keeping the BCS's selection process, but having a 4-team playoff system to determine the NC, would be much, much better.
Amen, brother!
Posted on 9/10/14 at 2:38 pm to JdbsLSUBR
sho nuff?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News