Started By
Message

re: Defensive success against HUNH

Posted on 9/5/14 at 1:00 pm to
Posted by DamnStrong1860
The Second City
Member since Oct 2012
3002 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Explain the 35 in 2012. Both games were hotly contested with turnovers on both sides like I expect again this year. But make no mistake Freeze's offense gives Chavis a problem. No idea why it's just a fact.


No one's trying to take credit from OM. I agree that there isn't the same desparity between the LSU Defense and the OM Offense as there is between the LSU Defense and the A&M Offense and some of the other Hunh offenses we've played.

BUT the close scores in the two outings under freeze means we are EVENLY matched. That still means we play OM's offense well. Just not as well as we do others.

To me, OM would have to be consistently beating LSU by two scores for someone to say taht OM's O does to LSU's D what LSU's D does to all other Hunhs.
Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
46496 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 1:02 pm to
We will hardly ever beat y'all by more than two scores. Hell hardly anyone beats you by two scores. The fact is that somehow Freeze's scheme works against Chavis' and not against Alabama's. Similar to how A&M's gives Bama fits but LSU has no problem with it.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64868 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 1:04 pm to
quote:


BUT the close scores in the two outings under freeze means we are EVENLY matched. That still means we play OM's offense well. Just not as well as we do others.


but when you take into consideration talent gaps....it absolutely has something to do with schemes.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter