Started By
Message
re: Auburn and UGA ESPN coverage
Posted on 9/1/14 at 3:57 pm to rbWarEagle
Posted on 9/1/14 at 3:57 pm to rbWarEagle
1. Clemson is a much better team than Arkansas.
2. UGA was more dominant in the 2nd half than Auburn was, despite the identical score.
2. UGA was more dominant in the 2nd half than Auburn was, despite the identical score.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 4:04 pm to IAmReality
quote:
1. Clemson is a much better team than Arkansas.
2. UGA was more dominant in the 2nd half than Auburn was, despite the identical score.
1. I'd say better yes but unsure by how much
2. I disagree. I wouldn't say the other way around either though.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 4:16 pm to IAmReality
mfw arkansas beats georgia
Posted on 9/1/14 at 4:28 pm to IAmReality
quote:
2. UGA was more dominant in the 2nd half than Auburn was, despite the identical score.
No. Not really.. If you are going by score, it was the same but we also downed the ball inside the 10 to end the game
The game were so identical, there is no way to dissect it.
I see holes in both programs...
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:36 pm to IAmReality
quote:
UGA was more dominant in the 2nd half than Auburn was, despite the identical score.
Not sure thats 100 percent fair. Auburn had a 80 minute rain delay. We were tearing Arky a new a-hole prior to that delay. we came back and finished, but the delay was something of a factor.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)