Started By
Message

re: Who should be more concerned after close Game 1: Bama or LSU?

Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:22 am to
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19749 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:22 am to
Lsu by far. Alabama looked pretty good on o, just need to get a bit more efficient in the red zone, with 2 games to tune up. Of the concerning positions, only cb seems to be real concern, but we are without our best option at that position (jackson). I expect by the meat of the sec schedule the starters at cb will be different. There was some confusing between the lbs and the safeties caused by depriests absence, opened up some holes in the zone. The dline was in 3 man for a large part of the game, couldnt get much pressure against 5 (shockingly). Did much better when we switched to 4 man front. Sims was 100x better than everyone was predicting, accounted for over 300yds, accurate in the short and intermediate game, didnt take many shots downfield. Playcalling was quite good I thought, oline was great aside from some drive killing penalties. All in all I think we are in great shape
Posted by Burt Reynolds
Monterey, CA
Member since Jul 2008
22443 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:28 am to
Homer pic
Posted by 167back
Dos Gris
Member since Jun 2012
4715 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:39 am to
bama started the game with a four man front.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter