Started By
Message
re: Dline or secondary- which was more disappointing?
Posted on 8/30/14 at 5:24 pm to theGarnetWay
Posted on 8/30/14 at 5:24 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
The whole scheme was around a 3-4 defense
We played a lot of 4-2-5
Posted on 8/30/14 at 5:26 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
We played a lot of 4-2-5
I had noticed that only because of all the talk about switching to the 3-4. But the 4-2 got no pressure and then we switched to a 3-4? The only time we got any pressure is when some LBs blitzed and that left the CBs even more isolated.. not that it seemed to matter.
eta: With that said without as much talent on the DEs that makes the disadvantage even worse. Even if they couldn't get through Clowney and Sutton at least drew double teams on a regular basis which cleared the way for others.
This post was edited on 8/30/14 at 5:34 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News